<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Content with Style - Comments on A to Z(ee) with P3P]]></title>
    <link>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/feeds/rss/comments/60</link>
    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 17:00:52 -0400</pubDate>
    <generator>Zend_Feed</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Content with Style - Comment #1 on A to Z(ee) with P3P]]></title>
      <link>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/a-to-zee-with-p3p/#comment-242</link>
      <guid>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/a-to-zee-with-p3p/#comment-242</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Good article overall.<br />
 A couple of advices from a longtime P3P user: validate your policy at  <a href="http://www.w3.org/P3P/validator.html">http://www.w3.org/P3P/validator.html</a>, because even P3P Editor sometimes gets it wrong. Another good and free tool (which usually gets it right) is online at <a href="http://www.p3pwiz.com/">http://www.p3pwiz.com/</a>. No matter how refined and elaborated your policy ends up, keep in mind that all IE really looks at is the HTTP header.<br />
Anyway, it&#8217;s good to see less known (and used) W3C specifications cared about: usually one sees mentioned only those starting with an X in the name and a smell of ivory tower all around, while the <i>legacy</i> stuff gets ignored. PICS, anyone?]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Good article overall.<br />
 A couple of advices from a longtime P3P user: validate your policy at  <a href="http://www.w3.org/P3P/validator.html">http://www.w3.org/P3P/validator.html</a>, because even P3P Editor sometimes gets it wrong. Another good and free tool (which usually gets it right) is online at <a href="http://www.p3pwiz.com/">http://www.p3pwiz.com/</a>. No matter how refined and elaborated your policy ends up, keep in mind that all IE really looks at is the HTTP header.<br />
Anyway, it&#8217;s good to see less known (and used) W3C specifications cared about: usually one sees mentioned only those starting with an X in the name and a smell of ivory tower all around, while the <i>legacy</i> stuff gets ignored. PICS, anyone?]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:30:46 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Content with Style - Comment #2 on A to Z(ee) with P3P]]></title>
      <link>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/a-to-zee-with-p3p/#comment-243</link>
      <guid>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/a-to-zee-with-p3p/#comment-243</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I find this quite an interesting subject, and I must admit that I come across this one the first time. So good that you keep us updated Matthias. djn, thanks for the additional links.]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[I find this quite an interesting subject, and I must admit that I come across this one the first time. So good that you keep us updated Matthias. djn, thanks for the additional links.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:10:13 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Content with Style - Comment #3 on A to Z(ee) with P3P]]></title>
      <link>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/a-to-zee-with-p3p/#comment-244</link>
      <guid>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/a-to-zee-with-p3p/#comment-244</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Oh yes, the validator. I came across that, but simply forgot to put it in. Thanks a lot. My struggle with P3P and the article altoghether was that it&#8217;s not really in fashion. <br />
P3P isn&#8217;t really new, the first draft is a good 18 months old, but because it seems at first more like another IE annoyance, and many websites don&#8217;t rely on cookies any more anyway, it never hit the big news.<br />
<br />
When I came across it, seriously, I had no idea where to start. So once I had made my way through several half-hearted tutorials and articles I tried to give a sound starting platform to other people by writing this.]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh yes, the validator. I came across that, but simply forgot to put it in. Thanks a lot. My struggle with P3P and the article altoghether was that it&#8217;s not really in fashion. <br />
P3P isn&#8217;t really new, the first draft is a good 18 months old, but because it seems at first more like another IE annoyance, and many websites don&#8217;t rely on cookies any more anyway, it never hit the big news.<br />
<br />
When I came across it, seriously, I had no idea where to start. So once I had made my way through several half-hearted tutorials and articles I tried to give a sound starting platform to other people by writing this.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:50:42 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Content with Style - Comment #4 on A to Z(ee) with P3P]]></title>
      <link>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/a-to-zee-with-p3p/#comment-251</link>
      <guid>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/a-to-zee-with-p3p/#comment-251</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[After a couple of years in the wilderness I think cookies are coming back now. With the rise of Web 2.0 apps and the recent focus on rich interfaces I think cookies are going to get more notice. I&#8217;m definitely going to have a look into this stuff for the interface development project I&#8217;m on at the moment&#8230;]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[After a couple of years in the wilderness I think cookies are coming back now. With the rise of Web 2.0 apps and the recent focus on rich interfaces I think cookies are going to get more notice. I&#8217;m definitely going to have a look into this stuff for the interface development project I&#8217;m on at the moment&#8230;]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 12:03:23 -0400</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
