<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Content with Style - Comments on IE7 and its problems]]></title>
    <link>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/feeds/rss/comments/102</link>
    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
    <generator>Zend_Feed</generator>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Content with Style - Comment #1 on IE7 and its problems]]></title>
      <link>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/ie7-and-its-problems/#comment-583</link>
      <guid>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/ie7-and-its-problems/#comment-583</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Yeah, it&#8217;s really not all that bad is it? It&#8217;s a hassle but not the killer many people were expecting. I&#8217;m not a big fan of conditional comments because they separate my rules but I can live with &#8216;em&#8230;]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, it&#8217;s really not all that bad is it? It&#8217;s a hassle but not the killer many people were expecting. I&#8217;m not a big fan of conditional comments because they separate my rules but I can live with &#8216;em&#8230;]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Content with Style - Comment #2 on IE7 and its problems]]></title>
      <link>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/ie7-and-its-problems/#comment-587</link>
      <guid>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/ie7-and-its-problems/#comment-587</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#8217;t use gte IE6, but probably target IE7 directly with if IE 7.<br />
<br />
This way you won&#8217;t have to update your site again when the next version comes along as it may partly fix the issues your CCing for.]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[I wouldn&#8217;t use gte IE6, but probably target IE7 directly with if IE 7.<br />
<br />
This way you won&#8217;t have to update your site again when the next version comes along as it may partly fix the issues your CCing for.]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Content with Style - Comment #3 on IE7 and its problems]]></title>
      <link>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/ie7-and-its-problems/#comment-588</link>
      <guid>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/ie7-and-its-problems/#comment-588</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Sander: That doesn&#8217;t make any difference, does it? Apart from the pre-asumption that IE 8 fixes behaviour that still is unsupported or faulty in IE, i.e. :after<br />
But even then, zoom:1 will not hurt and just be ignored, no? If you target IE7 only there is the chance that it breaks with version 8. But then again we&#8217;ll have to revise loads of code when 8 comes out anyway &#8230;]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Sander: That doesn&#8217;t make any difference, does it? Apart from the pre-asumption that IE 8 fixes behaviour that still is unsupported or faulty in IE, i.e. :after<br />
But even then, zoom:1 will not hurt and just be ignored, no? If you target IE7 only there is the chance that it breaks with version 8. But then again we&#8217;ll have to revise loads of code when 8 comes out anyway &#8230;]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Content with Style - Comment #4 on IE7 and its problems]]></title>
      <link>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/ie7-and-its-problems/#comment-610</link>
      <guid>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/ie7-and-its-problems/#comment-610</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://angryflower.com/itsits.gif">http://angryflower.com/itsits.gif</a>

<br />
<br />
<em>Edit: Bob pointed out that a title &#8220;IE7 and it&#8217;s problems&#8221; is a bit rubbish. I think he&#8217;s right and therefore corrected my mistake.</em>]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://angryflower.com/itsits.gif">http://angryflower.com/itsits.gif</a>

<br />
<br />
<em>Edit: Bob pointed out that a title &#8220;IE7 and it&#8217;s problems&#8221; is a bit rubbish. I think he&#8217;s right and therefore corrected my mistake.</em>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 18:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[Content with Style - Comment #5 on IE7 and its problems]]></title>
      <link>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/ie7-and-its-problems/#comment-611</link>
      <guid>http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/ie7-and-its-problems/#comment-611</guid>
      <description><![CDATA[Bob, shame on me, you&#8217;re right. After all those years in UK I am still struggling. Zeee Germanzzz &#8230;]]></description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Bob, shame on me, you&#8217;re right. After all those years in UK I am still struggling. Zeee Germanzzz &#8230;]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 23:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
