http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/feeds/rss/comments/127 Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:38:44 +0000 Zend_Feed http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/javascript-libraries/#comment-1905 http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/javascript-libraries/#comment-1905 Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:37:35 +0000 http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/javascript-libraries/#comment-1906 http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/javascript-libraries/#comment-1906
i can’t remember when jquery it was released (even as beta) but i do remember that the @media 2006 javascript frameworks panel seemed to be all over dojo.]]>
i can’t remember when jquery it was released (even as beta) but i do remember that the @media 2006 javascript frameworks panel seemed to be all over dojo.]]> Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:08:37 +0000 http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/javascript-libraries/#comment-1907 http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/javascript-libraries/#comment-1907
Mootools is nice, and Valerio is insanely talented, but the community involvement around jQuery, plus documentation, plus plugins, AND the Selector syntax and power all make me love jQuery.

I am an OO JS guy and I can still do OO with jQuery.

Honestly, I highly recommend making the move :)]]>
Mootools is nice, and Valerio is insanely talented, but the community involvement around jQuery, plus documentation, plus plugins, AND the Selector syntax and power all make me love jQuery.

I am an OO JS guy and I can still do OO with jQuery.

Honestly, I highly recommend making the move :)]]> Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:32:03 +0000 http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/javascript-libraries/#comment-1908 http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/javascript-libraries/#comment-1908 Is there any of that back-button funk already built in? And, as Dojo was mentioned, when you look at it in the way of tiny-toolkit (a la jQuery, mootools) against huge toolbox (Dojo, DWR), what’s the real need for the heavyweights?

Integration with the server-side and Push technologies seem to be part of the answer, but is that all? I mean, surely someone could use Dan’s Ruby integration and do some sort of port to Java? And is there anything push-related available in jQuery?]]> Is there any of that back-button funk already built in? And, as Dojo was mentioned, when you look at it in the way of tiny-toolkit (a la jQuery, mootools) against huge toolbox (Dojo, DWR), what’s the real need for the heavyweights?

Integration with the server-side and Push technologies seem to be part of the answer, but is that all? I mean, surely someone could use Dan’s Ruby integration and do some sort of port to Java? And is there anything push-related available in jQuery?]]> Thu, 18 Jan 2007 02:54:02 +0000 http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/javascript-libraries/#comment-1915 http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/javascript-libraries/#comment-1915 Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:20:00 +0000 http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/javascript-libraries/#comment-1940 http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/javascript-libraries/#comment-1940
And there’s a jQuery book in the works!]]>
And there’s a jQuery book in the works!]]> Tue, 23 Jan 2007 05:55:58 +0000 http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/javascript-libraries/#comment-2399 http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/javascript-libraries/#comment-2399 Sun, 02 Dec 2007 00:05:22 +0000 http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/javascript-libraries/#comment-2400 http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/content/javascript-libraries/#comment-2400 benchmark using a small dom between prototype and jQuery1.0 .
Of course, this is very well possible, but it still has to outweigh coding convenience and size. Since I’ve written this post, I’ve completely abandoned moo, by the way, the fact that they changed syntax for the 0.93 of mootools and then again for the first release was too annoying. Too many code examples were based on something old. If I can I’m using jQuery now, otherwise it’s mostly prototype. And that’s purely based on coding convenience, not size or speed.]]> benchmark using a small dom between prototype and jQuery1.0 .
Of course, this is very well possible, but it still has to outweigh coding convenience and size. Since I’ve written this post, I’ve completely abandoned moo, by the way, the fact that they changed syntax for the 0.93 of mootools and then again for the first release was too annoying. Too many code examples were based on something old. If I can I’m using jQuery now, otherwise it’s mostly prototype. And that’s purely based on coding convenience, not size or speed.]]> Sun, 02 Dec 2007 04:48:48 +0000